AARUK |
Home |
Contents - Regulations made by ARCUK - 2 Questions : How does the Architects Registration Board answer inquiries? - The wider remit : an observation on the claim of former Board chairman Humphrey Lloyd that "Arb only fulfils its statutory role, no more". - 2009 election : A majority of candidates support reform. - Status of the Registrar as Registrar and when acting as Returning Officer. - Occasional notes of Board meetings. - RIBA Report On the Registration and Regulation of Architects by Sir Christopher Ball - ARB and its statutory functions: another judicial precedent (April 2010) - On persons offered appointment to the ARB or its PCC. (April 2010) - The ARB continues to misconduct itself (May 2012) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The 2009 election In January 2009 the ARB Reform Group fielded 7 of the 20 candidates. Of the remainder, only Norman Arnold and Coskun Sanus appeared by their election statements to be aware of the limited scope of the powers provided to the Board by statute, and to convey their separate intentions to stay within that framework. The 2006 election The Architects Registration Board published the result of the 2006 election by way of a News Release. There is a link to summary of results, but no indication of the manner in which the votes were counted (See ERS comments above). 5 of the 7 elected members are committed to the reform of the Board.
[ top] |
|
Architects Act | ||
Architects Registration Board | ||
Registration | ||
- education | ||
- competence to practise | ||
Professional standards - the code, etc | ||
- PII | ||
- discipline | ||
Use of title | ||
Links to websites: | ||
- chartered bodies | ||
- legislation | ||
- historical notes | ||
xxx | ||