Contents

- Judicial interpretation relating to Part III : some useful guidance on the meaning of "standards", "serious" and "unacceptable".

- Discipline and questionable PCC decisions : powers, duties and criticisms of the PCC.

- Case Study 1 : procedural irregularities and two perverse decisions in consideration of charges brought under Code Standard 8.

- Case Study 2 (Part 1) : a similar case, involving the apprehension of a real possibility of bias.

- Case Study 2 (continued - Part 2) : the PCC decide – and a question of incongruity arises. 

- Note on Part III of the Architects Act 1997.

- Case Study 2 (continued - Part 3) - QC advises that the architect has an obvious and complete defence.

- Case Study 2 (continued - Part 4) - "Judicial nonsense".

- Case Study 2 (continued - Part 5) - A Court decision in favour of the architect.

Discipline and questionable PCC decisions

In 2005 the PCC fell under criticism for allowing itself to become merely an instrument for executing a policy of the Board which has since its inception been the subject of criticism (see PII). In 2003 the Royal Institute of British Architects had published a paper " The Status of the Architects Registration Board" anticipating and explaining the mistakes.

The decisions of the PCC in respect of the architects who have taken a principled stand not to return the board's Certificates of Compliance only serves to underscore the criticism.

[ top]