Notice of applications for the hearing 17 September 2007

1.         That the manner in which the members of the committee have been designated to this committee has provided the Board with an opportunity to influence the choice of members in a manner that is prejudicial to the defendant, and

            a.         has engendered correspondence between the Board (which is the prosecuting party) and the Committee members that is inappropriate in that it is over-familiar and opinionated in a manner that is prejudicial to the defendant, and

            b.         has engendered correspondence between the Board (which is the prosecuting party) and the Committee members that is inappropriate in that it is over-familiar and opinionated in a manner that is prejudicial and that accordingly the members of the Committee now designated should take no further part in this case.

2.         That the manner in which the Clerk has corresponded with the Board (whether represented by an officer or by a solicitor acting upon the Board’s instructions) displays

            a.         procedural irregularities, and

            b.         a persistent attitude of mind that distracts from the proper and objective application of the Clerk’s duties under the PCC rules and that accordingly the Committee should not hear the case against me until this Clerk is replaced.

3.         That the Committee provide me with the statutory notice that is my entitlement under s.14(4)(a) of the Act before considering whether the charge against me can be made out.

IS